Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that it is pointless to prevent wild animals from extinction nowadays. However, I completely disagree with this viewpoint because I believe the conservation of wildlife is essential for the environmental system.
On the one hand, it is unethical to think that wild species have no place in the 21st century. To start with, our planet Earth exists not only for human benefit but the beauty of nature is composed of a diversity of living things, plants, and resources. Moreover, in spite of the growing global population, it is not needed to exploit every last square inch of land to feed or accommodate the population. Instead, we can still live side by side with the wildlife. Finally, protecting wild animals is certainly not a waste of natural resources. The reason is that habitats for the survival of animals are also crucial for environmental sustainability. For instance, rainforests occupy not only animals but also green plants which absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen, therefore stabilizing the climate.
On the other hand, the preservation of wildlife can be quite challenging in this 21st century. Firstly, we need to think of high conservation costs particularly when our human race is solving the prevention of natural disasters such as global warming, lack of water, and climate change. Moreover, in terms of the human diet, wild animals like crocodiles and polar bears do not involve as well. Lastly, it is a logical thought that the spread of diseases can start from wild species and they are also consuming the biological needs of humans such as water and oxygen.
In conclusion, both arguments have merits. Personally, despite high costs and a demanding process, I assume we ought not to let wild animals die out as they play a partial part in the ecosystem and beauty of nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- Some people think the government should subsidize fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable Others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the ecosystem and beauty of nature.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in spite of, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09240924092 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79497232472 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7606621928 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8666666667 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165537198393 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595123332229 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674016461679 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090930564398 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273970610698 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.