In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Is it true that beginners are more likely to contribute than experts in any field of inquiry? To answer this question, one has to consider the fact that most fields require deep knowledge before even making the slightest innovative contribution to it. In my opinion, expertise is a must thing to have in any area to add something meaningful to the same.
First of all, there are so many professions including politicians, judges, scientists, businessmen, etc. that require profound knowledge to take effective actions that are not biased towards any group of society. It takes years of study and intense reading of materials to acquire the information required to make an impartial judgment in a courtroom. Similarly, in politics, one must have good enough experience in public service to even figure out what exactly the issues plaguing society, let alone find solutions to them. The same goes for the profession of teachers, they need to develop various teaching techniques for different characteristics of their students in order to make them truly learned.
Moreover, contributing to the field of science includes the capability of doing research in one way or the other. Now, to do research one needs to know about the important findings in that area which requires years of study. For instance, scientists like Sir Isaac Newton, Stephen Hawking, and Albert Einstein who were able to achieve ground-breaking discoveries in the field of physics devoted their entire life studying the mysteries that baffled humanity for years. As a result, they were able to develop theories of their own solving the long-standing problems of physics. Artists like painters and musicians also have to practice their respective arts for years which finally allows them to make masterpieces in the future.
Some may argue that, over time experts tend to become biased in their opinion, and may miss out on some facts or ideas. Surely, beginners can help with their radical thinking and new ideas in such situations to point out the missing links. However, one should not forget that a novice in all these fields would rarely be able to contribute something meaningful individually without any guidance from an expert.
To sum up, it is totally indefensible to say that beginners are more likely to contribute better than experts in any field of study. Although it is true that a novice can bring new ideas to the field, there will be a need for an expert to search through the development made in the field so far and find out new areas of improvement.
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave Do you agree or disagree Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 90
- Group Think 70
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment 73
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 73
- Study of cooperation and conflict between same age groups children 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...asterpieces in the future. Some may argue that, over time experts tend to become ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, as to, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02836879433 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7547346626 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5768321513 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3778781037 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355032308433 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116468606434 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184546294587 0.0737576698707 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212354417155 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146909619607 0.0645574589148 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...asterpieces in the future. Some may argue that, over time experts tend to become ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, as to, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02836879433 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7547346626 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5768321513 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3778781037 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355032308433 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116468606434 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184546294587 0.0737576698707 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212354417155 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146909619607 0.0645574589148 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.