The effectiveness of a country’s leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country’s citizens.
The author contends that the well-being of the country's citizens is the best way to measure the effectiveness of a country's leaders, and I concur with this. It is onerous and prone to errors to measure society's well-being based on social and economic equality, physical well-being and security, civil rights and liberties, and the extent to which they are being exercised. Therefore, one crucial factor would be economic growth.
To begin with, countries that suffer from poverty and other social dilemmas are one of the lowest-growing economies in the world. Economic growth is directly related to the effectiveness of the country's leaders and thus, the well-being of the general populace. However, in developing countries like India, the economic growth is pretty high, but there are widespread disparities and ills that plague society. Growth is often achieved at the expense of inequality, increased rates of unemployment, and the death of local resources. A leader with such a myopic vision cannot be considered effective.
Leaders are remembered for the changes they effected for the welfare of the general population and the struggles they pioneered on behalf of citizens. For instance, Abraham Lincoln and Nelson Mandela are considered effective leaders for their sacrifices and ideology pertaining to the well-being of the people of their respective countries. However, take the example of Saddam Hussain or Muammar Gaddafi. In the 1980s, Libya has higher per capita income than some of the developed countries. However, the lack of freedom and stringent surveillance under which the Libyans lived cannot be considered as well-being, nor can Gaddafi be called an effective leader.
For the overall well-being of the people, it is imperative that freedom of speech and expression, right to equal opportunities, and non-discrimination are protected. In the absence of these liberties, thoughts and ideologies cannot thrive. It is crucial to note the progress made by citizens in their respective fields to measure the well-being of all. The achievements of people in various spheres of life can be considered as a yardstick to measure how tolerant the government is towards incipient ideas. It can point very well to the support available in terms of finance and infrastructure.
In conclusion, the efficacy of a leader undeniably rests on the well-being of the citizens. Only the leaders who are successful in ensuring the above-mentioned rights and opportunities in balanced qualities to their citizens can be considered effective leaders in a true manner.
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 76
- Study of cooperation and conflict between same age groups children 78
- The people we work with have many different characteristics and all of them affect the quality of our time at work Of the following what do you think is the most important quality for a boss or supervisor to have a serious attitude about their work a lot 73
- Dog Breeding 80
- It is more important to work at a job that you enjoy even if the salary is low Than it is to have a high paying job that you do not enjoy 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...Libya has higher per capita income than some of the developed countries. However, the lack ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a true manner" with adverb for "true"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ens can be considered effective leaders in a true manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41293532338 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08907151306 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517412935323 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5015384355 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457749481591 0.236089414692 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129468895786 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128685383881 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257601908363 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939425964491 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.