The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph shows information about how many families in England and Wales owned or rented accommodation between two years, 1918 and 2011, with the assessed data given in percentage.
In general, it is observed that increasingly more English people could afford to own a house, but the percentage of rented households dropped significantly over the period in question. An interesting point is that there was a year when the percentages of both types of accommodation met.
Looking at the details, households in owned accommodation started with just above 20% in 1918, then there was a sharp increase to over 30% in 1938. Having remained stable for a year, the figure improved yearly by an average of 8-9%, taking over rented housing after 1971 and hitting a peak at almost 70% in 2001. This was followed by a slight drop to around 75% in 2011.
On the other hand, over three quarters of the residents rented accommodation in 1918, which was the overall highest percentage during the timeline. The data dropped rapidly to under 70% before recovering back in 1939. At that point, it witnessed a gradual fall over half of the decade to just above 30% in 2001 after which there was a marginal increase to around 35%, finishing the period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-31 | phadode | 78 | view |
2023-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
2023-06-10 | Aung | 89 | view |
2023-01-21 | Behnaz.babayani | 78 | view |
2022-06-21 | baokhanh | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- Some people think the government should subsidize fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable Others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Many people feel that urban environments are more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89622641509 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68573158513 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6373249884 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202493192378 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827452872282 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824064797641 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14097820015 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837953209383 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.