Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Certain nations build specialised facilites only to training top athletes for international sport tournaments, instead of making facilities for everyone to use. In my opinion, this strategy is a negative one, because in order for the country to compete internationally, the average citizens have to get the short end of the stick
Playing on the international ground and achieving high status bring pride and respect to a country, so training the best athletes to do it is beneficial. Focusing a nation's budget on building sport facilites only for top athletes ensure that they have the best training for international competition. Therefore, these sportsmen have the highest chance to accomplish great achievements for the country. Moreover, when athletes compete internationally, they inspire the people of their nations to also train in sports.
That being said, this strategy is still very detrimental to the average residents of those nations. Building sports facilities for all people encourages everyone to practice and be healthy. Playing sport is obviously important in keeping a person healthy both physically and mentally; so having facilities available to everyone motivate them to train. Not to mention, having everyone train sports provide them the opportunities to be talented and further compete in competitions. Those people then can train professionally and consest in international tournatments.
To wrap up, having top athletes compete internationally is important and beneficial, but that does not mean countries should ignore the average people. Some sports facilities should be built for the best sportsmen, but there must be those for the everyone to use too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 244, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everyone'?
Suggestion: the; everyone
... sportsmen, but there must be those for the everyone to use too.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57751937984 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14040805161 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538759689922 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6405350038 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329464740243 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128606537809 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780750767524 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213016061697 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424809185679 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.