Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary settings, distant learning has gained its popularity in every corner of the world. However, there exists a recent belief that studying online is less efficient than studying in a traditional class like before. From my perspective, I am in consummate accord with this viewpoint for reasons as follows.
To commence, going to conventional schools provides children with a chance to get holistic development. Regarding mental development, school goers can join and benefit much from a wide community of their own generation. To illustrate, it is available for students to communicate and make friends with their peers and even their like-minded friends who are slightly either younger or older than them. As a result, this will not only create an active environment that keeps students from being isolated but also encourages them to learn from their peers and improve numerous necessary communication skills. More than that, the standardized curriculum can ensure the physical health of students, as educators have become more aware of improving the youth's overall fitness. For instance, physical education lessons at school, along with occasional events such as dance competitions are all aimed to benefit students' health conditions. Therefore, students are less likely to contract obesity or other health issues that result from a prevalent sedentary lifestyle.
Beside that, that students joining conventional classrooms is beneficial to a number of parties in society. In terms of parents, they are more prone to feel secure when their children are educated in schools. Unlike online courses whose reputation are frequently doubted, educational institutions are genuinely highly-qualified in addition to the examined curriculum. Hence, parents can put their trust entirely on schools, and there is no need to worry about their kids having no caretakers. Furthermore, another advantage-taker of students partaking in schools should be the authorities. As the government invests much on educational sectors, either to improve the quality or to modernize infrastructures, it would be meaningless if students choose to stay at home and pursue distant learning. In other words, offline learning is a good way to utilize public resources and probably contribute to the society's development via tuition fees and related-costs like transport fares.
In summary, the aforementioned analysis indicates that studying in a classroom in traditional schools brings about a host of positives to society. Therefore, all learners had better go to school and acquire their officially-prepared programmes for their own sake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- People are responsible for their happiness Others feel happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 84
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63727959698 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15953571977 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622166246851 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2047884071 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.789473684 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185052893497 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524181546781 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384491990408 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104986862132 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357918544975 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.