The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
Various changes Grange Park has undergone since its opening in 1920 are illustrated in the given two maps. Overall, the park has witnessed striking transformations as it has been refurbished into a more diverse complex that offers people more possibilities for entertainment.
Grange Park is now completely different compared to how it was in 1920. Although the park did not relocate the entrances, an amphitheater for concerts has been built on the site of the previous stage for musicians. Facing it now is a rose garden, substituting with the water fountain, which is surrounded by seats.
Moreover, the water plants’ pond and garden were cleared out to make room for a cafe and a play area for children. On the north of this area, more than a century ago, was a glasshouse that now has been knocked out to construct a water feature. The seats which were beside this construction are now the entrance to the underground car park. Considering the seats, there has been a removal of four of them in the west of the park as well as the rose garden on the lower left of the park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
- The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas 89
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe world poverty can be solved by the governments of rich countries giving large amounts of money to the governments of poor countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71052631579 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81482521611 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1758148633 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134980079491 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615727391383 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046752225214 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973561609241 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015212970689 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.