The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on.
The given table illustrates the information about what people in the UK thought the government should spend more money on in 3 categories: health, education and other areas.
Overall, it can be seen that the vast majority of males and females believe that the state budget should increase spending on education and health. In addition, while most young people pay attention to education, old generations focus more on health.
In terms of gender, more than half of men think the government should allocate more money towards education, whereas only 32% spend on health. Meanwhile, the expense for health of women was 48%, which was a higher percentage than males, about 16% and only-fifths focus on spending education. The expense for other areas were 13% for males and 12% for females.
In terms of age group, more than half of citizens in the UK from 35 to 65 aged are encouraged the government should spend more money on health than education. On the other hand, a large number of young generations demand using money on education and the expenditure for other areas have a percentage difference according to age group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | letrinh | 70 | view |
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 73
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...alth than education. On the other hand, a large number of young generations demand using money on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02116402116 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6114957126 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4963766213 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236349964104 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112491569387 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13057292319 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18299010199 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14568253209 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.