It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives. Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages?
Taking risks is very decisive in both our professional and personal lives. Although it may hurt a person in the short term, it creates opportunities and I believe the positives of this behavior outweigh any negatives.
Initially, taking risks in our lives can unbalance the stability we have built. What I mean by this is that accepting risks leads to a turning point when we are forced out of our comfort zone. Take a person who has just started in a new profession as he expects better job opportunities for example. He will definitely find difficulties making ends meet, paying for basic needs, and settling in a new working environment at first, which are not concerns for him before. However, I believe these short-term burdens are worthwhile to take in return for better outcomes and benefits in the long run.
On the other hand, accepting risks can foster many positive results. Successful artists, businessmen, and sportsmen will not be at this stage if they played their lives safe instead of challenging themselves. For instance, if Mark Zuckerberg did not leave Harvard, there would be no Facebook, a giant social media platform. Moreover, he would lead a normal life, working as a 9-5 software developer and leaving no mark on the world. Also in our personal lives, we can only improve as an individual through performing risks and making mistakes.
In conclusion, taking risks plays an essential part in our career and personal lives. Despite facing problems temporarily, I think we should practice analyzing the situation and the degrees of damage to accept risks as they can broaden our horizons and lay footsteps to our success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | maidiem1508 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | maidiem1508 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | thaonguyen2k4 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | thaonguyen2k4 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | tohanhtrang | 78 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows predictions about the number of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 84
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f this behavior outweigh any negatives. Initially, taking risks in our lives can...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utcomes and benefits in the long run. On the other hand, accepting risks can f...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...performing risks and making mistakes. In conclusion, taking risks plays an ess...
^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...izons and lay footsteps to our success.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, i mean, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06545454545 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77375182263 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632727272727 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9804610184 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293878627254 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103891541416 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850254815849 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177741824203 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542591482019 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.