To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
The author states that to understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major society; I concede that a major part in the development of a country is contributed by major cities. Many big businesses, MNCs, and stock exchanges are located in big cities, so there are more diverse people living in big cities; this should be one of the reasons to buttress the author's statement. Beyond this concession, however, I find the statement’s contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint.
The chief reason for my disagreement lies in the empirical proof; there would be more diverse people living in a major city, but sometimes it is witnessed that people who reside in a big city have lost cultural background. They tend to behave like following their cultural past is an action which is done by financially backward class people. There is no doubt that there are still some people who follow their own cultural background. Sometimes major cities have to depend on small villages for their vegetation.
To better understand the most important characteristics of society, we need to understand the people who live in rural areas. 70% of the population of India lives in rural areas. Most of the rural areas in India have still preserved the old or ancient places which reflect their society. In India the major cities are political, financial, social capitals; which narrows the understanding of the society. So, to better understand the society one must visit minor cities, towns and villages.
There are many small cities like Dwarka; it holds the religious sentiment of hindu community people, industrial towns like Jetpur; this small town has a population of merely 2-5 lakhs but it is the biggest manufacturer and exporter of cotton sarees and dresses in the whole country. These types of cities portray a better image of a society. Another example are the small villages located in Rajasthan, which better represent the better understanding of how the Rajputana society worked in the past and dominated the region.
In sum, I find the statement indefensible that one should major cities to better understand the most important characteristics of society. The suggestion runs contrary to the overwhelming evidence present in today’s India, which presents the image that to better understand the important characteristics one should visit the small towns, cities or villages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | Mallika Asthana | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d be one of the reasons to buttress the authors statement. Beyond this concession, howe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ter image of a society. Another example are the small villages located in Rajasthan...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22081218274 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.897975945 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477157360406 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8775320465 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.94117647059 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376333891176 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122564975743 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138640492218 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208535506683 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113998654368 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.