A glance at the provided table illustrates the information about the proportion of bicycle riders in a city in 2011 by five different age groups and by gender. In general, it is clearly apparent that the most frequent age group who rode bicycle were the youngest group while the 40s and 50s cycled the least compared to other age.
Looking in more detail from the table, under 10 group showed the highest proportion in bicycle utilization with similar percentages for female and male at 51.3% and 50.5% respectively. Following the youngest group, the adolescent group (10-17 years old) rode bicycle at 24.6% to 42.2%. However, the percentage of male adolescent were only half of the female. Interestingly, beside the younger, cycling also popular in geriatrics group which reported at 13.2% to 18.5%. Similarly, old female riders also reported around 5% higher than male. Finally, the figures of the early adults (18-39 years old) and the late adults (40-59 years old) group who used bicycle recorded at the range of 9.7% to 17.1% and 8.0 to 12.3%, respectively with the proportion of female riders were also surpass the male.
- People who travel to another country to live work or study for a period of time often suffer badly from homesickness Why is this What are the best ways to reduce this problem 61
- Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn t be encouraged among students Do you agree or disagree with this idea 73
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'surpassed'.
Suggestion: surpassed
...e proportion of female riders were also surpass the male.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, similarly, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97872340426 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55748752047 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6706911498 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249990473114 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10969595088 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775049909987 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222946289651 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760116515598 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.