Today, many people do not know their neighbours in large cities. What problems does this cause? What can be done about this?
It is undeniable that nowadays, most of the citizens find that their neighbours are strangers to them in the urban area. In this essay, I will shed light on some reasons contributing to this phenomenon before showing some viable solutions to alleviate this potential issue.
The gap between people in a neighbourhood can be contributed to two main factors. First of all, the fast-paced life and competitive labour market are the key rationale for this problem. This is because people spend most of their time completing the stuff in companies as well as have pressure from the boss. Therefore, they lack of time to spend with their neighbours. Furthermore, lacking community activities also attribute to this issue. The citizens don't have special occasions to contact and communicate with each others in the neighbourhood. As a result of lacking public activities, the time that people spent to meet their neighbours is quite limited.
However, there are some feasible solutions to combat this problem. Firstly, companies and factories should offer more days off for workers. For instance, the weekends or special events such as Independence day, Mid Autumn,... when workers can spend time with their families and neighbours. In addition to this, the government should organize more social activities for the citizens to cultivate the society relationship. For example, in Bien Hoa city, Mid Autumn festival is taken place annually in every neighbourhood. Therefore., household in the same town have great time together as a huge family.
In conclusion, the fast-paced life and lacking community activities are two main rationale that lead to the gap between people in the same neighbourhood, which can be combated by companies, which can offer more days off, and the government, which can create more social events for the citizens
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Baobestfriend | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-26 | mai ly | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-26 | mai ly | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | dangtandat2k6 | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process of plastic bottle production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Today many people do not know their neighbours in large cities What problems does this cause What can be done about this 61
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o attribute to this issue. The citizens dont have special occasions to contact and c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...nts such as Independence day, Mid Autumn,... when workers can spend time with thei...
^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... place annually in every neighbourhood. Therefore., household in the same town have great...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'rationale' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rationales'.
Suggestion: rationales
...cking community activities are two main rationale that lead to the gap between people in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27986348123 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8918546119 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539249146758 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0315568389 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8235294118 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19658004822 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642133118516 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479930163091 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125208761197 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463760301234 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.