Automation of modern transportation is an obvious trend and passengers will experience no-driver vehicles. However, I suppose this may result in more drawbacks than merits.
To commence, given that there is no human supervision, automatic vehicles pose a large quantity of threats rather than safety. Precisely, driverless vehicles are merely the invention of human beings, and the possibility of having unexpected technological bugs can not be completely eliminated. Therefore, incidents may suddenly occur while in operation, leading to several devastating consequences. Consecutive deadly traffic accidents caused by Tesla automatic cars in the USA are the most prominent examples, which also aroused concerns about the safety of artificial intelligence in general.
Moreover, the absence of drivers could be a contributor to the service failure in the area of public transportation or taxi market. In hospitality, robots or AI devices can not substitute the emotional function of servants. As a result, the overuse of automazation may render the unwarmed feelings in passengers, which can eventually create negative impacts on the aforementioned sectors. For instance, Vietnamese passengers usually have a great number of conversations with the taxi drivers when they use the service, and this unique culture may gradually fade away, as well as the customers may feel less cared for if the automatic cars are brought into use on a large scale.
In conclusion, I suppose that the development in the phenomenon of non-driver vehicles pose certain threats to the society and the use of such modern tools should be limited to an acceptable threshold.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree Do you agree or disagree 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 78
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in one country 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55335968379 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17674453708 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1525608641 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.727272727 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121604503691 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413594010493 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465778242119 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070677137721 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315549002147 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.