Several cities tax their residents to provide them with good infrastructure, good roads, good hospitals, and also good and quality education. Quality education is one of the necessities of one’s life. The poor literacy rate is not a good sign for any country. There can be many reasons why Parson city is spending more money on the schools that most students attend. The statement that the Parson City residents place a higher value in providing a good education in public schools than blue city residents, this statement is not giving any visible proof of the mindset of Parson City residents that they are placing a higher value on education neither it shows that Blue city is not willing to provide higher education. There can be many reasons why a city is spending more on education.
The part of the letter to the city newspaper editor concludes that Pearson City residents place a higher value on providing a good education in public school than Blue City do. Pearson City recently spent almost twice as much as the blue city has for its public schools. For the conclusion to hold true, the following three questions should be reasonably answered and justified by suitable evidence.
Is the proportion of revenue determine the value of education? The proportion of revenue allocated does not necessarily make the higher value in providing education. Even if the amount is abundant, the allocated budget may sometime go into unfruitful expenses. Resources must be utilized properly for hiking up the value of education rather than proportionating the higher budget. So, before allocating a higher proportion of the budget in public schools, it must be accommodated it goes into the development of essential resources in school which will ease making students more creative and knowledgeable.
Are residents of parson city and blue city of the same interest? Even if the residents in parson city and blue city are equal in number, their interests may vary significantly. The residents of the blue city have concepts that the budget should be allocated proportionately to health, education, employment, etc. so that the overall development of society takes place. We can only have a good education if we are physically and mentally sound. So alienating more budget in public schools does not mean all students will have quality education. To expand the literacy, knowledge, and skill of a child, the child must be in proper health condition. Before allocating a high budget, the city must confirm that they have evenly allocated budget to health facilities too.
Are the residents in both the city equally perfect in financial condition? The cities may vary markedly in the economy. The financial status of people in Blue City may be weaker than the people in parson city. So the tax revenue generated from the residents may be comparatively lower in comparison to Parson City. The lower Tax revenue may engender a low budget so Blue City might have allocated a low budget for Public schools which doesn't mean that they are allocating low funds for public schools willingly. Allocating low funds does not mean they are not valuing public education. They are trying to value it but are restricted due to their economic condition. So for this to hold true the letter must lucidly mention that they are of the same financial quality.
The conclusion, as it stands now, is utterly flawed due to a lack of evidence that justifies the conclusion reasonably. For the conclusion to hold true, the answers to the above questions must be tacit with proper logical reasoning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-08 | ShirishBasnet1 | 60 | view |
- The birth rate in our city is declining in fact last year s birth rate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enrolled in our public schools will soon decrease dramatically and we can safely reduce the funds budgeted for educ 66
- Seven years ago homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community s yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted Since then average property values have tripled in Brookvill 54
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 50
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents However my recent interviews with childr 55
- Several cities tax their residents to provide them with good infrastructure good roads good hospitals and also good and quality education Quality education is one of the necessities of one s life The poor literacy rate is not a good sign for any country T 60
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 460 350
No. of Characters: 2276 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.631 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.948 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.697 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 171 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 92 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 72 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.934 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.48 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.313 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.507 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...d a low budget for Public schools which doesnt mean that they are allocating low funds...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2260.96107784 103% => OK
No of words: 459.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06753812636 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77949197396 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43137254902 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 705.55239521 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0324052917 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4615384615 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6538461538 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 5.70786347227 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13530236162 0.218282227539 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420498825077 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475310989211 0.0701772020484 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081462497858 0.128457276422 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514339796215 0.0628817314937 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.