The plan below show a school in 1985 and the school now. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures illustrate how school and it's surroundings has changed since 1985.
Overall, the area witnessed various transformations, most notably is the construction of sport facilities and appearance of greens, serving the increasing number of students from 1, 500 to 2, 300 throughout the years.
In the heart of the maps, trees have been planted necessitate the skringkage of the road system. These tracks also reshaped into semi-octagon, serving the expansions of car park situated inside, which has been necessary for the application of more students. The entrance and exist gates have remained unchanged for a 40-year period.
On the left side of the map, although the locations of the office has been intact, the size of it has been smaller, which was required for the installation of computer room and learning resources centre. Under the technology area, the sport complex has been built in place of a part of library, north of which lies a classroom, which has been moved west and replaced the position of a tiny car park. On the right hand-side of the maps, there has been a refurbishment of a campus, with an extra story being constructed in the building and new classrooms being erected. Still staying in the south of the has been the location of playing field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- The graph and chart below give information about migration to the UK The graph below shows how long immigrants in the year 2000 2008 intended to stay in the UK And the pie chart shows reasons for migration in 2008 73
- The plan below show a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- he charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the stages and tools used in the process of making a woodblock print in the tradition Japanese style 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0046728972 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82878609037 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61214953271 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3246760825 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0243142666766 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0146623122265 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414712816129 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0329902025096 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571407068985 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.