People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most
critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The given prompt states that people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. The given topic is highly contentious because different people may have disparate positions and opinions. Some may go for the topic, while others cannot argue with it at all. Personally, I agree with the given topic that people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. The reasons and examples supporting my position are presented in the following paragraphs.
To begin, the people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy can understand more about the idea and policy than other people they can find fault in the idea and policy; they can easily point out the advantages and disadvantages of the idea and policy and they are also the most critical of it because they really want to success of the idea and policy. Therefore they are also the most critical of the idea and policy, they are deeply committed about. For instance, Pradip Giri and his team in the Nepali Congress party were very committed in the policy of their party but at the same time they were also a critical of the policy carried by the parties because they were aware about consequences of the failure of the idea and policy so for positive reason they were critical of the idea and policy even they were very committed to the idea and policy.
In addition, the ideas and policies is coined to achieve the targeted goal and dreams so the people are very serious and sensitive of the idea and policy because they really want to succeed in the field; by analyzing different aspect they are always a critical of the ideas and policy because they have understood the positive and negative consequences. Therefore people who are most deeply committed to an idea or policy, they are also critical of it. For example, Mr. Sagar Pathak, CEO of Sahas Urja Pvt. Ltd, was very committed to the idea and policy of the board of his company at the same time he was also critical of the idea and policy suggests by his board because he was very much concerned about the positive and negative impact of the policy. He wanted even better idea for the company as per time and scenario so as a committed person of the idea and policy, he was also critical to the idea.
But, some people might not be critical of the idea and policy they are committed about because they do not want to make weak the idea and policy by indicating the flaws of it. We cannot deny this view but if we want perfect output of the idea and the policy we should be critical of it just for betterment. For example, Ram was the official of government of Nepal who was very committed to the policy of the government but at the same time he was also critical of it only because he wants better than this so his point was we should implement this policy and also we should implement another policy and we should implement new idea for better result.
To sum up, the reasons and examples mentioned above shows that people who are most deeply committed to the idea and policy they are also critical of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | s.sim | 62 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | mako_mew@hotmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | Jatin Chaudhari | 57 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | Abyaz Abid | 58 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | tengriqagan | 66 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 58
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...want to success of the idea and policy. Therefore they are also the most critical of the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the positive and negative consequences. Therefore people who are most deeply committed to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 38.0 14.8657303371 256% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48330404218 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26518764855 2.79657885939 81% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.316344463972 0.4932671777 64% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.844602717 60.3974514979 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.058823529 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4705882353 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293136216573 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153614906455 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105404658883 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228941253347 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657427456497 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.