Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential
extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your
reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you
should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how
these consequences shape your position.
How far should we as a society attempt to save the endangered species? Should we help them only in case we have caused the harm or should we help them because we understand their pain ? There are many species which have died due to human encroachment, and suffered a great loss. While human population has increased from 2 billion to 8 billion in last 200 years, many species have died because of our attack on natural habitat. At least now we should realize that we should come forward and revive them back into this world, independent of the fact who caused the harm. This is only possible by implementing proper policy and covering all regions.
Consider the Indian tiger, which are found in western parts of India, there population came down to 1000 in the recent years and still decreasing. They are killed for their skin and various body parts which are used for different purposes, mostly for superstition and orthodox beliefs. They might be predators but they are balancing the food chain and natural life cycle. It may get imbalanced due to human intervention. These species hunt the weak links of the wild part and keep the wild life healthy. If we as policy makers doesn't save them by imposing sever punishments on the hunters, then the whole wild life balance may change and overall health of other species may get affected.
Also, because of global warming many other polar regions are getting affected. Even we are directly affecting those regions but these temperature rise is the causing many polar wild life a grave danger. We as a society try to take steps to overcome this environment change, by encouraging more eco-friendly products than petroleum products. This may cause little disturbance in present market functionality but if not done today then it may cost more in future, by some estimates the expenses to undo these effect will cost many more trillions dollars in 2100 than today.
Not only the terestrial life need to be considered, the aquatic life which is seriously hampered by human presence. The rise in water temperature caused loss many coral reefs, and immense fishing has left many aquatic species in state of near extinction. Not only their life is disturbed directly but also indireclty, as in case of coral reefs. Only correct policy measures to stop fishing of some species and limiting the fishing troops can save them, all this will cause temporary disruption but will bear fruits in long term.
Ultimately, from the bulk of evidence, we can conclude that there is a urgent need of the policy which will check the terrestrial, polar and aquatic life balance , even if it causes temporary disruptions in our life. We are humans, who can understand others pain, thus it is our duty to save them by bearing some pain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | savaga1883 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Alex Cheng | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | graceeehgq | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | soap | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | M1randa | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a listener supported public radio station For the past year as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk musi 55
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 58
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ld life healthy. If we as policy makers doesnt save them by imposing sever punishments...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this temperature' or 'these temperatures'?
Suggestion: this temperature; these temperatures
...re directly affecting those regions but these temperature rise is the causing many polar wild lif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...if not done today then it may cost more in future, by some estimates the expenses to undo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...evidence, we can conclude that there is a urgent need of the policy which will ch...
^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...restrial, polar and aquatic life balance , even if it causes temporary disruptions...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85623678647 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49858818862 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522198731501 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6282998522 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.409090909 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150335983674 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509871126224 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447637939358 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821412998664 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443306196779 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.