The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

In our daily life, we do both positive as well as negative actions knowingly or unknowingly. One should able to recognize their actions as good or bad. Because their actions might hurt others. Keeping this in mind, the claim given here “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones” cannot be accepted completely. Praising the people for good things they have done should be encouraged while ignoring their flaws is dangerous. We should also make them know the negative things they are doing. In that way we can teach them effectively.

For an instance, my own experience suits well. Since from my childhood my father used to explain both good and bad things that might happen if I ask something and he will also give me the decision taking authority. One day he was teaching me how to ride a bicycle holding the cycle when am riding. After few hours of training, I told him that I can manage and asked him to leave the bicycle but he refused. There he explains if he leaves I can learn quickly but there is also a chance of getting injury severely which may cause me fear to ride again. After listening to this I obeyed him and successfully learned to ride without getting injury. Another example is that people will always praise the government for the munificence. Likewise, they have the rights to condemn for their dishonest and mischievous works.

In contrast to my claim explained in introduction paragraph, there are some places where we need to praise good things and ignore the negative ones when teaching. While teaching kindergartens or children we should encourage and motivate them instead of pinpointing their mistakes every time. We should also teach them not to do bad things but praising for their achievements should be more. When looking at the sculptures we should see and enjoy its elegance and beauty instead of sticking to the minor damage or mistakes in sculptures. We should praise sculptor for their artfulness in creating those beautiful sculptures.

Hence the way teaching by praising positives and ignoring negatives depends on the place and to whom we are teaching. Identifying the negatives and changing them into good ones must be practiced every day.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-17 guozhishan 50 view
2024-03-03 Zahid6400 66 view
2024-02-12 Tammy__kk 50 view
2024-01-30 HappyCandy 75 view
2024-01-30 HappyCandy 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user s.sim :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
In our daily life, we do both positive as well as negative actions knowingly or unknowing...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...recognize their actions as good or bad. Because their actions might hurt others. Keepin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: AM_I[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am I'?
Suggestion: am I
...o ride a bicycle holding the cycle when am riding. After few hours of training, I ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...creating those beautiful sculptures. Hence the way teaching by praising positives ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, likewise, look, may, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89947089947 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58372308549 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534391534392 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4039817565 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1818181818 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334698172537 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104500445276 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135539428011 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249579407441 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166903528335 0.0667264976115 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.