To some extent, I agree with the opinion that demands play a crucial role in creating leaders. However, the arguer extends the opinion to an extreme that demands is determined enough to cultivate leaders successfully which ignore other potential factors contributing the cultivation for leaders. On balance, my points of view and deep analysis are as follows.
It is undoubted that demands are significant even the most crucial factors for the emergence of leaders. It seems that there is no sound basis for the existence of leaders without the needs for leadership, which usually occur in the time of hardship. For example, in the years of pandemics, individuals have a strong desire to have powerful leaders to direct and develop potent and effective panaceas to eliminate the risky viruses, and having a leader is better to call for help and altruism from each other even within a small community. The emergence of leaders is exactly the response of needs.
However, it is uncertain for the success creation of leaders if there is only the factor of needs without other favourable conditions. As we all know, leadership is an innate talent rather than an acquired skill, which is the reason why the lessons and experience proved to be effective in a specific company render ineffective when applied to another inchoate company. Therefore, needs are just the basis and fundamental foundation for the creation of leader while they will not emerge without an adequate and appropriate talent reserve.
It is a complex issue for the creation of leader, in which needs and talent reserve are indispensable factors simultaneously. It seems that it is natural process and needed to take advantage of occasions which cannot be altered and determined by the willingness of human beings such as the emergence of disasters which develops huge needs of leaders. Meanwhile, needs will continue to be needs and cannot be meet without talent reserve, in which even the most violent disaster cannot create leaders.
In conclusion, demands are very significant for the creation of leaders while we cannot exaggerate their role and neglect other potential factors such as the existence of talent reserve.
- Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets However others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems Discuss these two views and give your own opinion 78
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 83
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline students cannot be motivated by school or college alone 83
- Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets However others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems Discuss these two views and give your own opinion 73
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 55
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16526610644 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74898541421 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49299719888 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1042279481 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170481536189 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069729551639 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347154107643 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993857990077 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320063234154 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16526610644 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74898541421 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49299719888 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1042279481 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170481536189 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069729551639 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347154107643 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993857990077 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320063234154 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.