In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree and disagree ?
Excessive consumption of fast food has been considered a catalyst for myriad ailments in humans, despite the reputation of such food in the catering industry. Hence, numerous individuals are of the opinion that heavier taxation should be levied on this service. From my perspective, I wholeheartedly agree with this viewpoint.
First and foremost, customers are likely to be discouraged from consuming fast food. Expanding on this point, higher tax is tantamount to higher charges on fast food companies, which results in significant increases in their products. Accordingly, people are under an obligation to sacrifice other essential purchases, like books or pills, just for some temporary pleasure. Such practice will possibly make almost everyone think twice before buying any fast food product. Therefore, a subsequent decrease in fast food consumption is virtually inevitable, concomitantly leading to an improvement in people’s well-being.
To add further credence to my assertion, the imposition of hefty tax can force fast food establishments to narrow the number of items in their menus. In the wake of the increased tax, companies may have no choice but to cut costs, which may include the purchases of materials. This can bring about a lack of ingredients in restaurants, forcing them to greatly scale down the menu. Consequently, if some iconic dishes are removed, people may opt for healthier food choices, including vegetables and fruits.
Nevertheless, the government should also consider other approaches rather than solely imposing tax. Chief among these is raising citizens’ awareness. By organising campaigns on various platforms or incorporating into children’s daily lessons, the authorities can not only educate people about the demerits of fast food, but also incentivize them to follow a healthier lifestyle. Secondly, should the opening and closing time of fast-food chains be confined to specific hours, individuals’ fast food intake can be substantially limited.
To recapitulate, there are a plethora of reasons why fast food should be heavily taxed. However, it is imperative that along with taxation, other viable solutions should still be taken into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree and disagree 90
- Some scientists believe that in the future computers will be more intelligent than human beings While some see this as a positive development others worry about the negative consequences Discuss both views and give your opinion You should write at least 2 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61976047904 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12264540718 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655688622754 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6076149886 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.277777778 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312238858671 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909157831916 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561082648357 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161199023393 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732250851523 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.