The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe

Essay topics:

The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevent.

Three diagrams provide data on the difference in a British location’s police budget between two years. The table demonstrates where the money came from and the two pie charts indicate the distribution of capital. From an overall perspective, the amount received from each source increased, with a largest proportion going to paying wages.

Looking at the table, it is clear to see that money gained from taxation in local areas increased the most. In 2017, the amount was £91.2m, whereas in 2018, it increased by £11.1million to £102.3m. Cash from other sources apart from tax and government fund increased only by a small margin, rising to £38.5m which is £0.5m higher than the previous year.

Turning to the two pie charts which demonstrate the specific distribution of the money, despite dropping 6%, salary payout remained the highest in the two years. Funds allocated to buildings and transport stayed 17% of the total budget. Money used for technological purposes, however, increased form 8% to 14%. Nonetheless, it remained the lowest of all three categories.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-09 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user butterflyluo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ceived from each source increased, with a largest proportion going to paying wage...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, whereas, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25433526012 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80102986745 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664739884393 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.288697713 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197605695373 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724789844143 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723171673623 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125249156472 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451238038663 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.