Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should add taxes to unhealthy foods to improve people’s health. Use details and examples to support your opinion.
No one can deny the fact that people of this modern era have easy access to anything they want and one of them is junk food which is considered unhealthy. Nowadays, the consumption of unhealthy food is likely to surpass the healthy one and this is deteriorating people’s health. In the given scenario, it is perceived that imposing tax on unhealthy food might be helpful to restrict the use of those item and improve health. Meanwhile, I am of the opinion that undoubtedly, adding tax could aid on limiting unhealthy consumption of food which eventually ameliorate people’s health. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with, with the advancement of technology there are various types of food available in the market and some are healthy whereas some are unhealthy ones. Similarly, people are suceptible to inclined towards consuming more junk food instead of home made. In addition, they are unknown about the fact that this has affecting their health long term. So, if government impose tax on these food item then the prices of commodities will elevate and subsequently consumer do not prefer to buy things that are expensive. This way, their health will also be in balancing state. Drawing from my own experience, I personally do not prefer to buy good that are costly. I believe that doing this I can save my money for future uncertainties rather than buying junk food that are detrimental to my health. Therefore, adding tax seems to be a convincing idea in order to enhance people’s heath.
Secondly, with the decrease in purchase production of such items will also eventually reduce. To be more precise, if people stop buying things then the manufacturing companies goes down which results them in paying more taxes without having a minimal benefit. To exemplify, if a company contiuously manufacture goods nevertheless people are not purchasing because of high price then the company have to suffer a great loss. This compelled them to restrict themself from producing goods and finally since people are limiting the consumption of unhealthy food, their health automatically begins to thrive. Hence, imposing tax on such food items definitely improves the heath condition of today’s people.
All things considered, imposing tax by government on food that are not healthy to people seems to be welcoming as people do not prefer to buy food for which they have to pay more sum consequently aid them in having quality health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-12 | meet96301 | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-16 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
- Now summarize condense the points made in the lecture compose your response and clarify how they provide a reason to feel ambiguous about the points made in the perusing passage 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 81
- It is better to have lots of friends than it is to have just a few friends Do you agree or disagree 60
- Some people prefer to live in the places that have the same weather or climate all year long Others like to live in areas where the weather changes several times a year Whichh do you prefer Use specific answers or details to support your answers 70
Comments
I believe that taxing…
I believe that taxing unhealthy foods can be a step towards promoting healthy eating habits and reducing health care costs in the long run. However, it is important to consider the potential impact on low-income families and ensure that healthy foods are available to all. In addition, the revenue generated from such taxes can be used to fund health initiatives and nutrition education programs. It is very important to have a well-designed tax service, like let's say this one, that will ensure that these policies are fair and effective. What are your thoughts on this issue?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...g term. So, if government impose tax on these food item then the prices of commodities wil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, i feel, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06038647343 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7881982658 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504830917874 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5569196811 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.263157895 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249259172378 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836274833331 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556102833241 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170504380844 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297299655492 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.