An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
An ailing patient should definitely have the right to access his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients under particular circumstances and for a number of reasons. Having such access may help the patient to determine the competency of the doctor he is going to trust his health with. This access to previous record may not be ethical or productive in every situations but can be beneficial in the specific circumstances explained in the following paragraphs.
Having seen and studied the record of treating previous patients in a similar situation can make the process of choosing a doctor much easier and free of stress for the paient. It is never easier for a patient to trust the ability of a doctor he does not know well as the medical treatment will have a direct impact on his health and this facility will help him in doing so.
It is important though, that the record being accessed by the patient strictly includes the treatment of only the former patients in a very similar situation from a medical point of view as only then it will truly reflect the competency of the doctor to treat this particular patient. If the record of patients at a much severe and hopeless level are made accessible to a patient with a comparatively better health, they might misconstrue the doctor's ability.
On the other hand, if the patient does find out a record of unsuccessful treatments on a number of similarly afflicted patients, they might dodge a bullet and increase the chances of a successful treatment by approaching a different doctor. It will prove to be a vital and beneficial facility at the patient's disposal and will help to improve the overall healthcare condition.
To conclude I would say that I agree that an ailing patient must have access to his or her doctor's record but only as long as the integrity of the said record is maintained and includes treatments that truly reflect an indication to a doctor's competency to treat a patient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Saket Choudhary | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | shalin63 | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | Jorobe8 | 50 | view |
| 2022-11-19 | Swarnali Swarno | 58 | view |
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor s record of treating similarly afflicted patients Through gaining such access the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition Write a re 50
- production of matchsticks 11
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- Claim Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s major field of study Reason Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated Write a response in which you discu 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as only 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...on from a medical point of view as only then it will truly reflect the competency of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...tter health, they might misconstrue the doctors ability. On the other hand, if the pat...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
... a vital and beneficial facility at the patients disposal and will help to improve the o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...s that truly reflect an indication to a doctors competency to treat a patient.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, similarly, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81470588235 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7717978501 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452941176471 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6806540206 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.7 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 23.4991977007 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.527987914953 0.243740707755 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242249172479 0.0831039109588 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143942400377 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328511121024 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130919387351 0.0667264976115 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.