Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies, while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While the proponents of robots say that robots are considered as an integral part of societies in the future, others are of the opinion that robots may no longer benefit human and possibly have the drawbacks on societies. This following essay will discuss both viewpoints and assert my support for the latter opinion.
Granted, robots can do wonders for human by giving a helping hand in work. To be specific, the robotic specialization is designed to perform jobs which are repetitive or hazardous, leading to reducing stress and risks for people. For example, household chores seem to be tedious for most of the young after a grueling working schedule, the robot machine can be an effective solution for them to finish those housework. In addition, robots may be helpful in analyzing data and making decisions due to its precise and reliable control system. Thanks to that credible system, productivity is boosted effectively to drive economic growth.
On the other hand, opponents of the robot industry argue that artificial intelligence may have negative impacts on social life. First and foremost, since robots are widely applied in various jobs, it may cause significant unemployment, resulting in poverty in society. In undesirable situations, it possibly expands the gap between social status by means of wealth. Furthermore, the emergence of robots can cause myriad cyber crimes. In other words, robots’ benefits may be exploited for personal advantages based on unjustifiable purposes. For instance, some people use it for cyberattacks, which deliberately spoil and leak individuals’ information for retaliation or money scamming.
In conclusion, while acknowledging the support for the viewpoint that robots play a key role in societies, I am convinced that robots still have harmful influences on social life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-04 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | thaodan | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Khanh Linh Le | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | grahamoneil | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | cryssievy | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this housework' or 'those houseworks'?
Suggestion: this housework; those houseworks
...n effective solution for them to finish those housework. In addition, robots may be helpful in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion for retaliation or money scamming. In conclusion, while acknowledging the s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have harmful influences on social life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95949847591 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63986013986 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4234606955 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285527376757 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930700687256 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074433876881 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190303422682 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776282084169 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.