Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Access to higher education is fundamental to contribute to the personal and social growth of individuals. Those with the zeal for education to pursue their long-term objectives and establish a solid financial foundation should have the opportunity to enroll in their desired educational institutions for further personal development. I strongly agree with the proposal and argue that offering free education to admitted students in need holds numerous benefits for three possible reasons.
Firstly, providing free university education to financially challenged students ensures that the higher level of education is accessible to every student, regardless of their economic background. This policy reinforces the idea that education is not a privilege, but it is the right of every individual who strives for their both personal and academic purposes. For instance, countries like Germany and Switzerland have successfully implemented tuition-free education methods, which resulted in higher enrollment rates among underprivileged students and a diverse student body. Moreover, this practice promotes unity within society and also diminishes the economic imbalance. By eliminating the financial burden to those qualified students, governments can ensure higher learning, and ultimately leading to a workforce that represents a diverse background and perspectives.
As technology advances each decade, individuals become extremely talented as they are born to a new developing world where they have the opportunity to utilize their talents. Therefore, the potential of talented individuals should not be limited due to financial constraints. Offering a free university education enables institutions to identify and support those gifted students who may otherwise remain as hidden gems due to their inability to afford higher education. Consider a scenario where a brilliant mind from a third-world country is unable to attend a university because the indigent family lacks funds to provide for higher education. Thus, if given the opportunity, this student would not only achieve academic experience, but might bring an innovative solution and contribute to society as a scientist, a researcher or an artist. By granting access to free education, governments not only allow them to pursue academic excellence, but also raise the reputation of society with their innovative ideas and rich perspectives.
The correlation between education and economic growth cannot be understated. Meaning that free education would bring well-educated and financially free human capital. Thus, the contribution of education to train a highly skilled and knowledgeable workforce is essential for a country's economic advancement. When students receive a free university education, they obtain specialized skills which distinguish them in their fields. Similarly, they make an effort to become experts who attempt to innovate, research, and invent to support the progress in the world. For instance, the Japanese government has enabled students from certain low-income households to be eligible for free education, which led to a skilled workforce that played a crucial role in its economic and social development.
To conclude, offering students a free university education cannot afford the tuition is a progressive step that yields numerous benefits. By addressing the issues of equal access to education, discovering the potential of talented individuals, and advancing the economic growth through skilled human capital, governments contribute to overall development of society. Rather than being a burden, free education is a valuable investment that leads to a brighter future and flourishing world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | s.sim | 62 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp 90
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 875, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a diverse background and perspectives. As technology advances each decade, indi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 38.0 12.9106741573 294% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3161.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87546468401 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13914327572 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509293680297 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1009.8 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9518516196 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.434782609 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3913043478 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23944526894 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753780438581 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609029074192 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14997672345 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021966520446 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 48.8420337079 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.1639044944 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 173.0 100.480337079 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.