Some people think governments should spend money on sports facilities for training top athletes.
Others think it is more important to spend money on sports facilities for everybody.
Many people argue that governments should be responsible for providing state-of-the-art sports facilities exclusively for elite athletes, while another group argues that this budget should be directed towards making sports equipment accessible to the general public. In my opinion, governments should spend on ordinary people since public physical health is more important than individual top performance, but they should also invest in top athletes because they also bring honor and recognition to country.
On the one hand, prioritizing sports equipment for top athletes should be the government's primary concern. Olympians bring prestige and honor to their countries when they clinch medals in international competitions. For example, Khudadad Azizi, an Iranian football player, employed cutting-edge techniques that led Iran to secure its first international victory in football. This achievement opened up numerous opportunities for other athletes and elevated Iran's profile on the global stage. Clearly, policymakers are encouraged to allocate a substantial and specific budget for competitive sports.
On the other hand, sports activities play a crucial role in improving the overall health of a community, and as such, governments should make them accessible to all. Without proper sports facilities for public, residents cannot exercise, and this causes their health problems so the society cannot develop. As an example, in Iran, over the past five years, numerous parks have been equipped with sports facilities, and free classes have been organized. As a
result, there has been a noticeable reduction in the incidence of diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and heart attacks. It is clearly that governments should allocate their resources to
enhance public health by encouraging citizens to engage in regular physical activities.
In conclusion, as the reasons mentioned above, i believe while international competitions offer significant opportunities for communities, the importance of public health should not be overlooked.
- The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories 11
- The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where re 73
- Some people believe that governments should only fund scientific research that will benefit human lives e g lead to a curve for a disease or to an increase in food production Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that it is a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 84
- the maps show changes in a city in 1950 and now 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...king sports equipment accessible to the general public. In my opinion, governments should spen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 48, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...lusion, as the reasons mentioned above, i believe while international competition...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94295302013 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0756365375 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8527554594 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.230769231 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301680385544 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966707988954 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760882854186 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127163753997 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986710768352 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.