The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

The given bar chart compares the the time of telephone calls in terms of three types in the UK during a period of seven years.
Overall, while national and international calls and mobiles call saw an upward trend in the amount of time, local calls saw a fluctuate trend. It is clear that poeple spent most time for domestic calls.
In 1995, the amount of time made by local calls was about 70 billions minutes, followed by national and internaltional calls and mobiles calls, around 35 billion minutes and 5 billion minutes respectively. The local calls fluctuated considerably, peaked at 90 billions minutes in 1999 and then dropped to over 70 millions minutes in 2002.
Regarding the mobiles calls, until 1998, the quantity of minutes of this call was just under 10 billions minutes. This figure then increased significantly and finished at about 45 billions minutes. National and international calls saw a slight increase, reached a high of approximately 60 billions minutes in the last years of this period of time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-11-26 Ahmad_off 70 view
2023-11-26 Ahmad_off view
2023-11-12 Daniel3003 56 view
Essays by user Phuong1810 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
The given bar chart compares the the time of telephone calls in terms of thr...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
The given bar chart compares the the time of telephone calls in terms of thr...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... in the amount of time, local calls saw a fluctuate trend. It is clear that poeple spent m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lions minutes in the last years of this period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99415204678 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75142314668 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1838484724 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245237944391 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109986044441 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682795819695 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152894860133 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645346584281 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.