The plan shows the design of a community centre 10 years ago and now.
The diagram compares how a community has changed over a span of 10 years.
Overall, it is clear that the office rooms has decreased in number and the garden has been changed into indoor sports.
Over 10 years, the old biggest office room has been separated into 2 different ones which are a new office room and a storage. On the northests corner of the community centre, 4 small office rooms have been combined to a larger one. The hall, which was in the middle of the centre, has remained unchanged either location or its capability of people.
The storage which was on the South of the hall has been replaced by a cafe area with a coffee bar has been constructed in the old office room nearing the toilet. Antother interesting change is the indoor sports areas has been coverted into a public garden, which is on the top left-hand corner of the map.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-30 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Ho Mia | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | sun1412 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-02 | rika_lavarose98 | 100 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | Amarpreet Singh | 78 | view |
- The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 61
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a salmon 78
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture below shows a hot balloon works The picture below shows a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52903225806 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34544303228 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.91036354 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0488965922701 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308379385223 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437503797034 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431341119777 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516176017083 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52903225806 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34544303228 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.91036354 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0488965922701 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308379385223 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437503797034 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431341119777 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516176017083 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.