The plan shows the bookstore in 2000 and the bookstore in nowadays

Essay topics:

The plan shows the bookstore in 2000 and the bookstore in nowadays.

The graph depicts the structure of a bookstore in 2000 and it is in the present day. Overall, the entire plan of the previous bookstore remains unchanged instead of several categories in the center and the place on the above side.
According to the given data, it is obvious that the position of the travel, newbooks table and service desks stay stably as they were in 2000. Nevertheless, the space for travel book is widen. Below them is the entrance, which is used for check in as well as check out.
Looking closer at the plan, a large fiction room on the left is minimized. Otherwise, cookery,hobbies and art, which were lied at the middle of the bookstore, are transferred next to the small fiction. Furthermore, the space in the center is replaced by three similar tables and chairs that people can utilize inside the bookstore. On the other hand, another fiction near the previous cookery, hobbies and art is adjusted to non-fiction. Especially, a new brand cafe'counter as the old non-fiction made place for it.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-30 Phuong1810 11 view
2023-02-24 Ho Mia 84 view
2022-08-23 sun1412 73 view
2022-06-02 rika_lavarose98 view
2022-01-31 Amarpreet Singh 78 view
Essays by user Ho Mia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hobbies
...he left is minimized. Otherwise, cookery,hobbies and art, which were lied at the middle ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...se, cookery,hobbies and art, which were lied at the middle of the bookstore, are tra...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, nevertheless, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80113636364 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72025019169 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5659626813 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139600906841 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554240893557 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877793838904 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117445458577 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130813709136 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.