Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
HEATH ISSUES TECHNOLOGY HELP THEM IN EDUCATION
EDUCATIONAL SITES ONLINE CLASSES
UPTOGATE WITH TECHNOLOGY BETTWE FOR FUTURE
WASTAGE OF TIME
Although some parents think that cell phones are beneficial for their children, others do not permit their children to use them and I agree. In my opinion, I consider smartphones has a plethora of side effects on their health and also a source of wastage of time for them.
To begin with, Firstlly, why parents did not allow their children to use phones is that as it leads to health issues. Children who use their cell phones for their studies, need to spend more time on screen. As a result, harmful radiation emits from the screen effect their eye-sight. For example, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University 60 percent of children suffer from health issues because of internet access on their phones. Therefore, I agree that forbiden children by their parents is a good decision to protect them from such serious ailments.
Another possible issue is wasting too much time on mobile phones while searching a useful content on the internet. Even though children can get access of ample of study material from the internet via using cell phones, they were easily distracted by advertisments displaying on the screen. Consequently, young children waste their precious study time on unuseful sites. To illustrate, a recent academic research done by the Australian govenment, 35 percent of children gain profit from the internet while others easily get distracted by other content on the internet.
In conclusion, whereas people may vary in their opinions, I consider that using internet technology on phones by young children has negative impacts on their health status and disturb their time schedule for study as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 73 | view |
- You recently went to a public event for example an exhibition festival or show that you think your friend would enjoy Write a letter to friend In your letter tell your friend what the event was explain why you think your friend would like the event invite 87
- With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Write a letter to your friend from a different country Invite him her to a party at your home and include the following what the party is about give directions on how to get to your place suggest how to accommodate him her 100
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why HEATH ISSUES TECHNOLOGY HEL 73
- You recently took a trip to another city and you had a plan to visit your friend who is living there However you couldn t see him her Write a letter to your friend and say Apologize for not being able to meet Give your reasons Suggest how you can meet som
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57363705323 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548148148148 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2445068781 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244834925604 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104225092486 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504715416846 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159864277556 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356663494776 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.