NOWADAYS, CELEBRITIES ARE MORE FAMOUS FOR THEIR GLAMOR AND WEALTH THAN FOR THEIR ACHIEVEMENTS, AND THIS SET A BAD EXAMPLE TO YOUNG PEOPLE. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
Currently, there are some arguments about what celebrities' achievement are not equal with their wealth and charm and it bring a negative effect for youngers. I completely agree with this opinion and in this essay I shall give some examples to advocate my view.
On the one hand, there are a lot of kind of famous person who is working in various field such as medical, educational, and so on. They contribute a part of providing basicallly information of their industries for their audience. A further point to consider is that social development like tiktok which is the most popular recently. For example, videos can fo viral when it experienced a careful censorship and select audience who is suitable and who is not. Hence, it too difficult to give a disadvantages impacts for younger excepting they agree to consume to those negative videos.
On the other hand, technological advanced era when people can earn money easily that need a cell phone and stay at home or anywhere. Those people referred influencer who have a huge fan on their social media. Moreover, their audience do not know what their talent or how is interesting. But, their confident ability they can earn a lot of money just a night by livestream to sale products for brands. In fact, it truly badly impacts on teenagers who are studying and spending almost their time on the internet ever single day. They can do not concentrate on what they are taught by teacher and just want to be famous.
To sum up, there are some peole believe that famous people will be a negative effect for young people. I believe it true.
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch tv programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 73
- In some countries today many people decide to have their first child when they are older What are the reasons Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Do you agree or disagree that celebrities are paid far too much money 61
- NOWADAYS CELEBRITIES ARE MORE FAMOUS FOR THEIR GLAMOR AND WEALTH THAN FOR THEIR ACHIEVEMENTS AND THIS SET A BAD EXAMPLE TO YOUNG PEOPLE TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 73
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...qual with their wealth and charm and it bring a negative effect for youngers. I compl...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive some examples to advocate my view. On the one hand, there are a lot of kind...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to consume to those negative videos. On the other hand, technological advance...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by teacher and just want to be famous. To sum up, there are some peole believe ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, for example, in fact, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7761732852 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62942802694 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4906688119 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321035485389 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946966019832 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696837419342 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180448662115 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460569621933 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...qual with their wealth and charm and it bring a negative effect for youngers. I compl...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive some examples to advocate my view. On the one hand, there are a lot of kind...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to consume to those negative videos. On the other hand, technological advance...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by teacher and just want to be famous. To sum up, there are some peole believe ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, for example, in fact, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7761732852 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62942802694 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4906688119 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321035485389 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946966019832 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696837419342 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180448662115 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460569621933 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.