The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The given bar chart illustrates the amount of Australians of different genders and age groups who engaged in regular physical activity in 2010.
In general, both men and women tended to exercise less when becoming adults. Nevertheless, it is also noticeable there was approximate equality in the figures for the elderly of both sexes having workouts on a regular basis.
As can be observed, teenage boys were the most active when more than half of boys aged 15 to 24 regularly did physical activities. However, that rate fell by over 10% when surveying males who were in their 40s, making them the group taking the least workouts. Meanwhile, those figures for females gradually increased from 47.7% to 52.5%.
Regarding the other features, the proportion of women who were between 45 and 54 joining in exercise became the highest, at 53.3%. In addition, male adults were inclined to be more diligent when getting 65 or over, at 46.7%, which was nearly equal to that of females.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 73
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 84
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 89
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98181818182 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55797785149 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.715151515152 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3554429862 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279711425399 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112189106327 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154804393094 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189103955884 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184690164585 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.