The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life. Why is it the case? Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future?
Human workplaces are constantly evolving so as to satisfy the demands of the ever-changing society. This is a contributory factor explaining why employees undergo changes in their occupations and working situations to adapt to the new ways of working. Therefore, there is a need for workers to update the latest developments in their job positions and orientate themselves towards high-demand jobs.
That robots and automatic machines have overtaken some manual labor is the primary rationale for the increasing tendency to switch jobs and working states. This can be attributed to the fast growth of technological advancements, facilitating human painstaking activities. Not only are these machines invented to complete tasks in a faster manner, but they are also more affordable for corporations to purchase than to recruit more employees. For example, Bottech, a company about robotics and automatic mechanism, has launched a project called “No-human Cafeteria”, which replaces all human workers with robots. This company reported that the dismissal of human employees makes their normal fee for recruitment drop at a significant rate; moreover, the newly launched operations are not prohibitive at all but also offer quicker customer services.
One viable preparation for the current workforce is updating the latest developments of their career.
Many companies are integrating new technology with their current workflow; therefore, having some fundamental information keeps employees more comfortable with these technologies. This can be helped by enrolling in courses available on the networks which allows workers to learn effectively. Moreover, that tertiary institutions orient their students to the appropriate career path, reducing the chance of changing jobs is another feasible solution. By organizing some workshops about career orientation or current developments in a specific occupation, schools will assist their students in knowing better about their future career, resulting in making logical and rational career decisions.
In conclusion, with the rise of artificial intelligence and automation, robots have been taking over millions of job positions, dismissing a considerable number of employees. I believe advising people to choose their careers wisely and staying updated with the current career trends and essential know-how are the keys to avoiding possible troubles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-11 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | TLan168 | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | TLan168 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The charts show what Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below give information about a plan to redevelop an industrial site 84
- Some people believe world poverty can be solved by the governments of rich countries giving large amounts of money to the governments of poor countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uman workplaces are constantly evolving so as to satisfy the demands of the ever-changin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87749287749 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08677856049 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0422005041 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.533333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154978647096 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536533403399 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511489070559 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840200540065 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038485773819 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uman workplaces are constantly evolving so as to satisfy the demands of the ever-changin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87749287749 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08677856049 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0422005041 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.533333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154978647096 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536533403399 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511489070559 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840200540065 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038485773819 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.