The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates a meticulous analysis of the change in the prices of three metals: Copper, Nickel, and Zinc across the twelve months of 2014. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the prices of all these metals experienced a decrease in the first six months, then remained stable from July to September before increasing towards the end of the period. Additionally, nickel started with the highest percentage change of the three but ended up in the lowest position, whereas the opposite was true in the case of zinc.
In January of 2014, the percentage change for nickel based on the previous month was 6%, by far higher than copper (2%) and zinc (1%). Thereafter, its percentage change plummeted to a low of -3% in June, after which it remained unchanged between July and September before ending at 1% in December. On a related note, Zinc navigates a more moderate course, skillfully avoiding the extreme volatilities exhibited by its counterparts. The proof for this inference is that the zin’s price was up only 1% initially, followed by a sharp rise to reach a peak of 3% in February. However, dropping significantly to hit its lowest point of -1% in June, still higher than the lowest point of nickel (-3%), staying relatively stable over the following four months, and growing considerably to reach 2% in December, outweighed copper and nickel to be the highest ending point among all mineral prices in the end of the year.
Finally, commencing at the second highest (at 2%), copper saw its most dramatic fall during the first half of 2014, reaching its trough of -0.5% in June. After stabilizing from July to September, the figure went up marginally to finish at 1.5%, despite a negligible dip in October.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 56
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 56
- The bar chart provides data about average weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years Overall food had a higher rate in 1968 Meanwhile in 2018 families spending more money on housing and leisure fuel energy was the lowest In 84
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, still, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89562289562 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71538749576 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4292399441 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.4 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111844548298 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507381080553 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557394214264 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797718148814 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487552051898 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.