The bar chart below shows the number of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants.
The bar chart shows how many male and female students went to 4 different evening activities at an adult education center, while the pie chart highlights the proportion of the age of course attendees in 2009.
Overall, in all courses except for sculpture, the number of women dominated that of men, whereas the largest percentage of participants was for seniors aged 50 or above.
In detail, the numbers of women attendees were 20 in drama course and 40 in language course, which were twice as many as men in those courses. However, men outnumbered women in sculpture classes, being 10 and 5 respectively, while painting was the second popular course among women at that education center with 30 students.
As for the age distribution, students aged under 20 accounted for by far the least proportion, at 5 %. While just above two-fifth of students were older people whose ages were 50 or over, 40-49 aged students made up 26%. The percentage of students who were at the age of 20 to 39 constituted 27% in total.
- Traditional ideas from older people about the way to live and behave are not helpful to young people and their futures To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Manufacturing instant noodles 78
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- Although plastic bottles are causing enormous to the environment their use and production is still on the rise Why do you think that is the case What can be done about it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, whereas, while, as for, except for, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84571428571 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71985259536 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7191777953 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307265634976 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138151816476 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10711559983 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197885520561 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111923766115 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.