Some people today believe that it is acceptable to use physical force to discipline children, but others feel it is completely unacceptable. Discuss this view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, in the education industry, an issue exists, as disobedience among youngsters has reached an all-time high commonness, along with increasing levels of notoriousness, prompting the necessity of measures to combat this trend. Among the proposed alterations come the reemployment of corporal punishments in the educational landscape in light of the past testimony of its effectiveness and the severity of the current situation. However, many hold low weight to this proposal, restating reasons for its prior abolishment and the possible harms it may incur in a modern setting. In my opinion, while a heavier deterrence may be desirable, extreme reprimandation can lead to extensive consequences.
Various rationales lay the foundation upholding this viewpoint. To begin with, its immediate warnings of misconduct are a major selling point to parents and teachers alike. Authorised adults often need to put children into obedience from a young age to prevent rebellion in adolescence from spiralling out of control. Harsh punishment can leave immediate and indelible imprints of the first-time violations, dissuading additional offences due to the unawareness of their misconduct. Additionally, children can gain insights from the consequences of their actions, such as the importance of discipline or regulating and controlling their behaviours and emotions. This helps refine their personalities and strengths, doing them good for much further in their lives.
However, the detrimental effects physical discipline has on the development of schoolchildren are too grave to ignore. First and foremost, direct physical injuries can have negative impacts on both the physical and mental health of young schoolers. Pupils might become fearful and resentful of schools, the place to them is of only invariable suffering and stress. More severely, this can lead to problems such as anxiety, low self-esteem or depression. In addition, the use of physical forces in education fosters a contrasting learning environment to be peaceful and effective, resulting in an obvious but substantial decrease in academic qualities. Furthermore, this can perpetuate a wrongful conception of violence for offenders, living their childhood with the inception that physical violations can be acceptable under permissible circumstances, leading to a never-ending cycle of abuse. To illustrate, numerous surveys have shown that parents choosing to use physical discipline against their offspring often correlate with being subjected to similar treatment during their early years of life.
In conclusion, while multiple points may be given to advocate for the legalization of corporal punishments, it is not a reasonable option, and should not be employ in modern education.
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news programs Agree or disagree 82
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Many criminal commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What effects will they have on society 95
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74572127139 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23882907995 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61858190709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6448187094 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.555555556 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118049934842 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347855225032 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279407134619 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0567187105841 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493597998554 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 78.4519038076 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.