The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980, with projections until 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the fuel consumption of the US from 1980 to 2030 with projections.
Overall, the quadrillion units of petrol and oil were the largest in 1980 and will continue to rank first in 2030 with the biggest rise. Except for hydropower units that will plateau in 2030, the consumption of other fuels will experience a rise. Throughout five decades, nuclear, solar and natural gas consumption will increase gradually, whereas the consumption of petrol and coal will rise significantly.
In 1980, the consumption of petrol and oil were at the first place with 35 quadrillion units, surpassing that of coal by nearly half. The natural gas consumption ranked second with 20 units, four times more than that of the least consumed fuels such as nuclear, solar and hydropower (under 5%).
From 1980 to 2010, nuclear power was the only fuel that experienced a gradual increase. While the consumption of coal, natural gas and petrol fluctuated, the two remaining fuels only showed a mild fluctuation. From 2010 to 2025, the consumption of nuclear, wind, hydropower and natural gas will have remained static. However, the units of petrol and coal will have been surging significantly.
In 2030, the consumption of petrol and oil will reach a peak of approximately 50 quadrillion units and secure its first place. The consumption of coal will nearly surpass that of the previous second-ranked natural gas with a gap of 5. The remaining fuels that used to rank last will divide their rankings, with hydropower taking the last place.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- The diagram below shows how soft cheese is made 73
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Internet is becoming a dominant element in modern life What are the advantages and disadvantages of the Internet 67
- The table shows data about underground railway systems in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger numbers per year in millions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where rele 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ropower units that will plateau in 2030, the consumption of other fuels will expe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0790513834 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82815093651 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458498023715 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.932334463 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8461538462 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113213794751 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585151004984 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495215337246 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974929731469 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598097839438 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ropower units that will plateau in 2030, the consumption of other fuels will expe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0790513834 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82815093651 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458498023715 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.932334463 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8461538462 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113213794751 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585151004984 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495215337246 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974929731469 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598097839438 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.