The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the change in the number of enquiries asked by three different forms of communication in one city over the course of six months in 2011 and these enquiries were received by the Tourist Information Office.
Overall, while enquiries asked through letters or emails saw a slight decrease throughout the period, the other two means of communication, including in person and by telephone, experienced upward trends. In addition, the number of requests sent by people who preferred to meet directly jumped significantly over a 6-month period and ranked in the top position.
Regarding the number of people who liked to send their requests through emails or letters, the figure showed that the number of these means received by the Tourist Information Office witnessed a small decline in the first two months, from about nearly 800 requests in January to 700 requests in March. Furthermore, the data seemed to sharply collapse between March and May with over 300 enquiries, and it remained stable until the end of the period.
Enter the other two forms of communication, which were in person or by using the telephone. Both of these means saw remarkable rises during the six months. The number of enquiries received by people who were interested in using the telephone started roughly at 900 requests in January, and fluctuated slightly in the next two months, before significantly rising in the last two months, at 1600 enquiries in June. The Tourist Information Office, on the other hand, received about 400 enquiries from people who met in person in the first month of the year; however, this figure began to jump remarkably after that and reached the first rank in June when the Office received nearly 2000 requests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05902777778 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69424532125 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.6183153354 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.888888889 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252819983788 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102708397125 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991785134059 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180315651292 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100799602585 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.