The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph compares the proportion of spending on five different categories in the US, Canada, the UK, and Japan in 2009.
Overall, all the nations spent on food, housing, and transportation more than on health care and clothing. In addition, it was observed that housing was the most commonly chosen item throughout the year 2009.
Specifically, 26% of the Americans’ budget was spent on accommodation, the most popular spending among the five categories, followed by transportation, food, health care, and clothing, with approximately 17%, 14%, 7% and 3% respectively. In terms of Canada, citizens in this nation also spent mostly on housing, at about 21% in 2009. Subsequently, it was 20% for transport category, 15% for food, 6% for fashion, and 4% for health care system.
Looking at the UK’s spending, people allocated 20% of their money to food, 24% to housing, 15% to transportation, 6% to clothing and about 2% to their health expense. Meanwhile, Japanese people paid mainly for their food, at roughly 23%. The percentage in the remaining categories seemed to be lower, with 22% spending on housing, 10% on transport expenses, and below 5% on both medical care and fashion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12886597938 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03173861797 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7649945284 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110249055282 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524560240433 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045412041545 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813073889279 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462320426331 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12886597938 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03173861797 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7649945284 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110249055282 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524560240433 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045412041545 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813073889279 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462320426331 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.