In recent years, there is an increasing of people who suggest that using alternative medicines and treatments as a replacement of conventional medical traditional way. In my opinion, this trend could bring several of harmful impacts on the patient health and also their financial position.
Most patients who choose to use alternative treatments do not know about the origin and information of the ones they use. In addition, these always are not dedicated by scientific evidences and government. It could lead to the risks for their death due to the fact that illness people could not know about the suitable way to apply these medicines for their sickness. For example, a number of people living in undeveloped area where lack of amenities and medical technology often choose alternative medical treatments have higher health problem proportion than visiting doctor in the other locations.
Moreover, the use of alternatives results in delay of time for receiving proper medical care for patients. It tends to make their health problems become worse and progressing of illness condition. Besides that, this way of using medicines can make the fee higher and also death risk in the worst cases. As an instance of negative impacts by relying on the medical replacements rather than the suggestion of doctors is the case of former worldwide famous CEO of Apple. In the time of cancer process, he believed that alternative medical treatments are more effective than the proposal from profession doctor. By the time he eventually sought medical intervention, it was too late.
In conclusion, it is true that sometimes alternative way could have some positive effects on the health but most of the times, I believe on the opposite trend that it is a negative development which brings several risks for people.
- the chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 78
- The chart below gives information about how families on one country spent their weekly income 1968 and in 2018 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...f the ones they use. In addition, these always are not dedicated by scientific evidences a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and also death risk in the worst cases. As an instance of negative impacts by rely...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15986394558 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79809612788 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7198066327 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.692307692 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240355810978 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789008030763 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497171779073 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148692152069 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291457689651 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.