Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that graffiti should be prohibited, while others assume it should be permitted and provided spaces by local authorities. This view carries out both arguments which I will elaborate in the ensuing paragraphs.
On the one side, opponents of supporting spaces for graffiti believe that painted art in preserved buildings without concept might damage and prompt loss of their values. The heritages have detailed maintenance to protect the originality. It is evident that spray painting in the several historical sites in Bandung requires high cost for property owners to vanish the artworks. Furthermore, graffiti is identical with spreading hate speech and provocative designs so called vandalism. The more insulting the drawings are made, the greater opportunities the conflict will explode in the surrounding area. For instance, vandalism in Bengaluru leads to chaos and anarchy, engendering public panic.
On the other side, supporters of this view argue that graffiti represents the progress of modern art in the cities showing that the local amateur artists can express their current artworks interpreting rapid globalisation. Not only high technique but also innovativeness are expected to create brilliant contemporary artwork. Moreover, drawings on public walls can be an iconic place and attract international tourists. Apparently, the rate of numerous visitors is able to boost economic growth generated by tourism and increase the regional revenue. For instance, Nottingham Underpass is legal spaces for graffiti, thus, various designs are shown along the street and fascinate travellers all over the world.
To sum up, even though this issue seems more beneficial to some points, it seems to me that providing spaces for graffiti by the government brings more drawbacks. Those include damage of preserved buildings and delivering humiliating speech.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | giangngoc | 82 | view |
- Robots can free people from difficult and dangerous work However some people are worried about the possible dangers robots may create Discuss the benefits of using robots and the possible dangers from it 89
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 100
- In more and more countries people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts Why might this be the case Is it a positive or negative development 80
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think we can improve our intelligence through learning Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays employment options are changing and employees cannot rely on having v the same job 1 and working v conditions 2 throughout their life What are some possible causes Suggest some ways to plan for the future under these circumstances 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...s view carries out both arguments which I will elaborate in the ensuing paragraph...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67137809187 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88412396313 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657243816254 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5026199427 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257972939644 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652236504952 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847374409513 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151971123294 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730030872867 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.