The table below gives information about the average annual distance travelled by adults and the types of travel in 1977 and 2007.
The given table illustrates the annually average distance travelled by mature people with many types of vehicles namely walking, bicycle, car, motorcycle, bus, train, and taxi over a period of three decades starting from 1977 to 2007.
Overall, as can be seen from the table, while an upward trend was seen in the average annual length by car, train, and taxi, the opposite trend was seen in the figures for walking, bicycle, motorcycle, and bus. In addition, car was by far the vehicle used most by the mature people over the given period.
In 1977, the average distance made by using cars was the highest, at about 3500 kilometers, while the figures for walking was significantly lower, at only about 400 kilometers. Meanwhile, people used bicycles and motorcycles for roughly 200 kilometers annually, 100 kilometers for each. Additionally, the annual distance transported by the public transports like buses, trains and taxis were high, at 800 kilometers, 900 kilimeters, and 200 kilometers respectively.
In 2007, the average annual distance made by cars rocketed to 7100 kilometers, doubling the distance at the beginning and remained the highest number in the table. At the same time, there was a slight decline to 80 kilometers and 90 kilometers in the figures for travelling by bicycles and motorcycles respectively, while the quantities of distance made by buses and walking dropped noticeably to only 500 kilometers and 300 kilometers. By contrast, whereas the annually average distance used taxis witnessed a remarkable rise by 600 kilometers to 800 kilometers, an unsignificant growth to 1000 kilometers was seen in the figure for trains.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-24 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stakeford in 1930 and 2010 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The plans below show the South Wing of Walton Museum in 2008 and in 2012 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2641509434 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88477176781 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505660377358 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4736579894 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198447121025 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921347226053 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843224315107 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142789111446 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896529008386 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.