Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this day and age, choosing the place to live has become a controversial issue. While it would be argued by some that living in a horizontal city could bring them the best qualities of lives, I am of the opinion that living in a vertical one would be a better choice to settle down.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why many people would have a tendency to live in horizontal cities. The first reason is that when living in these cities, people could pay less for building services, which might partly helps them in saving money for personal demands. This is because horizontal cities would not give them as much modern amenities and facilities as the vertical do. Another reason is living lower to the ground is safer for inhabitants when emergencies occur. For example, when fire breaks out in the building, it would be much more easier for people living in low floors to escape than the higher ones.
On the other hand, despite the above analysis, I still believe that settling down in vertical cities could bring more advantages to the residents living there. First of all, a city with skycrapers would have more space for public usage. Since the less residential area is, the more public places will appear, which serves the demand of the inhabitants. Secondly, living in high-building cities could bring to the population a wide range of goods and services. A typical example of this would be since living in Ha Noi, the capital city of Viet Nam, it would not be hard for the residents to meet their demands from going shopping easily to buying rare things in the street markets.
In conclusion, although many people think that living in the low-building city should be the best choice to live, I am still in favor of living in a city with skyscrapers would be a greater one.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 78
- The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries 67
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...bring them the best qualities of lives, I am of the opinion that living in a vert...
^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...s out in the building, it would be much more easier for people living in low floors to esca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...other hand, despite the above analysis, I still believe that settling down in ver...
^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...city should be the best choice to live, I am still in favor of living in a city w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41864502356 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521875 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7700710977 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.461538462 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275982834331 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101902942366 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797866177406 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19224319166 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544433602434 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.