Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
In this day and age, it is widely assumed that international tourism has a negative impact on the nations where foreigners come to. This essay will look at some primary causes of this and offer some possible solutions to the problem.
To commence with, there are a number of reasons why national citizens thought that international visit is a cause leading to negative effects on their country. The first reason is it may have an adverse impact on traditional customs and indigenous practices because tourists may be insensitive towards the feelings of local residents. A typical example for this would be when coming to Vietnam, many foreigners would have a tendency to wear comfortable clothes, such as the revealing ones or short dress, to pagodas and this is natively thought to be unacceptable in formal places. Another reason is some foreign visitors often pollute or litter in beautiful spots and several famous beaches, which partly leads to environmental pollution for the country.
In addition to the above analysis, there are several actions that could be taken to mitigate the problems mentioned above. First of all, tourist agencies should urge visitors to respect the local customs and culture of their hosts. It would be necessary for the foreigners to follow the national rule and wear the suitable clothes when coming the formal places such as pagodas, churchs and temples. Secondly, bodies such as the World Tourism Organisation must enforce strict regulations on the tourism industry. As a consequence, the rate of foreign visitors following the rules might increase and there would be developments in the tourism industry.
In conclusion, there are various factors leading to the thinking of international tourism has a bad influence to their country of the local people and measures can be implemented to tackle this issue.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- The table below gives information about the average annual distance travelled by adults and the types of travel in 1977 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20066889632 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75674564231 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8054326448 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18770399767 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664328371968 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563173415163 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121805421986 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050587911112 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.