Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The question of whether university students should have the freedom to study subjects of their choice or be limited to practical and future-oriented fields such as science and technology is a topic of ongoing discussion. While some argue that students should pursue their passions, others advocate for a more pragmatic approach. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting a balanced view.
On one hand by increasing the pupolation and request for study in a special field at university become a serious problem for universities because all universitires have a determine capacity to accept students in a special field. Hence, it has much cost for them to accept extera students. In addition most of them take entry test for accepting them. Hence, if teenagers want to study on their foavritve field should pass lots of obestacles or give much money for their studying. Sometimes governnments set rules for universities to attract international student that can become a source of income for both of government and university.
On the other hand, there are most students that can learn many things beside their study. for instance, they can learn mechanic to repair vehicles in same time with their courses. It is very useful for their future life because their learn an extra technic. Not only can improve their ailities and skills but also in some cases it leads to change their career when they know about their talent. Although it is very good for someones it might hurm of courses of some else. Therefore, it should be a voluntary rule for following.
In conclusion, although both of these issues are good I think it is so beeter in students have this chance to work and learn in different majors.
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir foavritve field should pass lots of obestacles or give much money for their ...
^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...n learn many things beside their study. for instance, they can learn mechanic to re...
^^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... although both of these issues are good I think it is so beeter in students have ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00696864111 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69718821487 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3164973427 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236407201419 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792224707127 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652075294874 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152601456531 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976087121443 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.