The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the annual income of the number of house owners who lives in the United States in three 2007, 2011, and 2015 years.
It is obvious that by 2007 and 2015 there were upward trend totally by income of people who have home and there was a declining in 2011 that has downward trend rather than others. The highest number was related to 2015 and the lowest number was in 2007.
As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 million and then recover to their first location in 2015. In contrast, the households who have 100000 or more income annually decreased first in 2011 and raise more than 34 million that was the heights point among all others. The incomes related to 75000-99999$ declined in 2007 and 2011 about 1 million and reached 15 million in 2015. Although there were lots of changing in the owner’s income in the United States the people included 50000-74999$ did not change in these years.
In conclusion, the point is that the number of household’s income who gain less than 49999$ decreased.
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps below shown an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predications for 2030 and 2040
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 61
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...s a declining in 2011 that has downward trend rather than others. The highest number ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$25000'.
Suggestion: $25000
...07. As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...74999$ did not change in these years. In conclusion, the point is that the num...
^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$49999'.
Suggestion: $49999
...f household’s income who gain less than 49999$ decreased.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6914893617 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36646539014 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537234042553 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5835464614 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223285581019 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108972176248 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559955226873 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154618022123 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427644572084 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.