Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others believe that the main interest is in the world of business. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is an ongoing debate about the primary focus of international relations. While some contend that its chief purpose is environmental protection, others argue that the economic growth is its main focus. Although both viewpoints hold significant merits, I am inclined to advocate the former for the following reasons.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons to view environmental protection as the main goal of international relations. First and foremost, carbon dioxide emissions and other harmful pollutants from agricultural and industrial activities have resulted in rising global temperatures, which have a detrimental effect on human health. As a result, it is essential for governments to implement global initiatives to safeguard their residents and promote sustainable and prosperous development. Moreover, rising sea levels have submerged numerous coastal cities across the globe, leading to the disappearance of unique cultural and historical sites, which could negatively affect tourism. Consequently, the loss of cultural diversity may deter international tourists, necessitating coordinated global actions to address the problem.
Conversely, international relations can foster economic activities, driving the economic growth of a nation. The rapid pace of globalisation has required many nations to sign trade agreements that prioritize tax reductions on imports and exports, thereby promoting commercial activities among nations. For instance, the free trade agreement between Vietnam and the United Kingdom has prompted many private enterprises to exchange agricultural and industrial products at lower costs due to reduced tariffs. As a result, these exporters have significantly increased their economic value, contributing to a more developed nation.
In conclusion, although both viewpoints have notable advantages that cannot be overlooked, I argue that environmental protection should be the fundamental purpose of international cooperation. When a country successfully addresses rising sea levels and the impacts of pollutants on human health, it can redirect national funds to other sectors, ensuring sustainable development for future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-21 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MinhGoal1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 100
- Some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with help that is not financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about the news However others believe that they can learn the news more effectively through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some experts suppose that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- In numerous nations there is a growing trend for individuals to frequently discuss financial matters such as their earnings or expenditures in everyday conversation What are the reasons behind this phenomenon Is it advantageous or detrimental 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...s argue that the economic growth is its main focus. Although both viewpoints hold signific...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...oth viewpoints hold significant merits, I am inclined to advocate the former for ...
^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...e advantages that cannot be overlooked, I argue that environmental protection sho...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1335504886 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27832322315 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638436482085 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6896727941 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116800815333 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410492518301 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513983608599 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714839847504 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368075231051 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.