Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, many families who send their children to private schools presume that they should not to be compulsory to pay taxes that uphold state upbringing system. Those families claim that they are not part of schooling system, so they don’t need to take attend of education enhancement. This essay will argue why those families are not liable for the rearing system, and should not pay taxes.
It’s a merit for any authority if citizens unify to help the progression of education system, and take it with caution to get elite resolution. To clarify, how do private schools get their teachers? From citizens, right? So, there is an odd that they graduated from government schools, so when authorities formulate good-mannered, schooling system will be escalating for government and private schools briskly. For example, in Spain they take nearly 50% of employees’ salary in taxes to improving their upbringings system and on other fields. So, everyone should corroborate their country by paying taxes without thinking about if they will gain benefit from it or not.
Despite the imperative of paying taxes whether they send their children to private schools or in government schools, the idea that these taxes are required is completely preposterous. People pay taxes to get a conducive service in return, so why pay taxes for something not useful? Families already pay for private school fees and services so they don’t need to care of authority’s schooling education or pay taxes for them, but they should pay other taxes for sure.
This essay argued people that side with paying taxes for education system even if their children are in private school. In my opinion, parameters of paying taxes that if they see it as a privileged and grasp it.
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important Others however think that it s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet 78
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring system, and should not pay taxes. It’s a merit for any authority if citize...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they will gain benefit from it or not. Despite the imperative of paying taxes w...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they should pay other taxes for sure. This essay argued people that side with ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y see it as a privileged and grasp it.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10689655172 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63021182963 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.541871985 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.785714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378363511451 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156266854004 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105958501214 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277453702942 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553814536704 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.