The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
Punishing for their wrong activities is a part of teaching. I disagree with the statement that just by praising positive actions and ignoring negative actions we can teach a particular person. Teaching is a service to the society in which deviated person is shown a right path. To align a person in right path making him realize about his negative ones play a prominent role.
By law, any person who is involved in criminal activity will go to jail or punished in some other way. This act is to make him realize about his wrong doing and become a gift for society. If such criminals had been neglected, they would become bane for this society. Here jurisdiction acts as a teacher and make criminals learn about their mistakes.
Sins must be punished. For another instance, there are many epics originated from our ancestors in which evil is always destroyed by good. Though there are many interpretations about the evil character and about his positive sides like Ravan in Ramayan and Duryodhan in Mahabharat, they are finally punished for their sins. Thus our ancestors have shown the way that for every evil action performed, there should be a response of rectifying mistakes and punishing for that.
As a teacher, he should recognize positive elements in every person and praise them. Meanwhile, he should also rectify their negatives and make them take a right path. Being optimistic doesn’t mean ignore negative ones. Thus, to teach we should not look at only positive ones and ignore negative ones , instead make them well known of their mistakes and give a chance to make their mistakes or negatives right.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 41
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 70
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 54
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ey are finally punished for their sins. Thus our ancestors have shown the way that f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y positive ones and ignore negative ones , instead make them well known of their m...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204620462046 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.194719471947 0.157235817809 124% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0792079207921 0.0880659088768 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046204620462 0.0497285424764 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0759075907591 0.0444667217837 171% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.118811881188 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0561056105611 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55826387411 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.019801980198 0.030933414821 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0792079207921 0.0997080785238 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.026402640264 0.0249443105267 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013201320132 0.0148568991511 89% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1630.0 2732.02544248 60% => OK
No of words: 275.0 452.878318584 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92727272727 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.58838876751 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.32 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250909090909 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203636363636 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109090909091 0.132149295362 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55826387411 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 219.290929204 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 59.6923178865 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1875 23.380412469 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8052775787 59.4972553346 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 141.124799967 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 23.380412469 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.674092028746 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 42.2784090909 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.19791666667 1.64882698954 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350709624879 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114047896183 0.123202303941 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0901418576639 0.077325440228 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.485044162256 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139835996273 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108978360567 0.161403998019 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083842160233 0.0892212321368 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.185144572928 0.385218514788 48% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0447758902368 0.0692045440612 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213744161887 0.275328986314 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938691272908 0.0653680567796 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.4325221239 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30420353982 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 7.22455752212 14% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.