An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.

Essay topics:

An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.

Current generation doesn't want to get into blind assumption that doctor has all abilities required to treat his mediacal condition. People are pragmatic with all the subjects especially Medical conditions. They believe in no risks can be taken with respect to medical issues. Yes, it is very much helpful if a patient is able to access his doctor's record and track records in medical field and his treatment.

The kind of efficiency the doctor is can be made by analyzing his track records. By knowing the outcome of other patients after the doctor treatment on similar medical issues gives patient an idea of his doctor's capability. IFor example, if the records show positive , then patient may feel sense of positive attitude towards treatment and his doctor which in turn may help psychologically for patient. Many cases have been proved that a patients psychological condition on certain medical treatments is considerable. Without any kind of exposure for records, patient may be in the position of insecurity or doubtful about his doctor. Also, looking at concession side if records show any kind of negative about the doctor performance it may harm patient's belief in his doctor. Also, if it is not in later stage of treatment patient can decide to shift to some other doctor consultance.

There are many social websites and applications available socially, for instance Practo - An android application as well as social website, where people get to review their doctors based on their experience with him. It has been a perfect example which proves exposure of doctor records is a very good idea in the process of treatment. Thus, its doctor responsibily to consider each and every case, irrespective of their magnitude of effect on patient must be handled very attentively. Else, it may be a black spot on his career.

Exposure of track records also acts like a proof for hospital or doctor who is trying advertise themselves in their specialized fields. They not only brag about their specialization and promise about high level treatment, also they provide records to patients as proof. But if we carefully analyze the negative side of the issue, however patient may not be well educated to determine the doctor's ability. Patient may not no the circumstances before failure of any treatment. Same circumstances may not be repeated in his case. But, it is patients choice and also right to chose to see doctors records.

To summarize, this generation people having access to all kinds of information going around the world just by accessing internet, they know what could go wrong. Hence they dont want put themselves into the risky situation. Hence, they choose to look into doctors record in treating patients with similar medical condition and for sure, it has a lot of advantageous looking from patients perspective as well as doctors perspective.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 JENIRSHAH 50 view
2019-12-29 samruddh_shah 50 view
2019-12-02 Harshali_15 50 view
2019-11-30 Masterji 66 view
2019-11-26 sarahaduwa 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user shachand9 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
Current generation doesnt want to get into blind assumption that ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...or example, if the records show positive , then patient may feel sense of positive...
^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a patient' or simply 'patients'?
Suggestion: a patient; patients
...tient. Many cases have been proved that a patients psychological condition on certain medi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...y not be well educated to determine the doctors ability. Patient may not no the circums...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ne the doctors ability. Patient may not no the circumstances before failure of any...
^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nternet, they know what could go wrong. Hence they dont want put themselves into the ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey know what could go wrong. Hence they dont want put themselves into the risky situ...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'as well as', 'with respect to']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27626459144 0.240241500013 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.143968871595 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0817120622568 0.0880659088768 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0583657587549 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0642023346304 0.0444667217837 144% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.130350194553 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0389105058366 0.0406280797675 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76842447391 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0291828793774 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.00194552529183 0.0016655270985 117% => OK
Determiners: 0.0661478599222 0.0997080785238 66% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0252918287938 0.0249443105267 101% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00972762645914 0.0148568991511 65% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2871.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 473.0 452.878318584 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06976744186 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380549682875 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302325581395 0.280924506359 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186046511628 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114164904863 0.132149295362 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76842447391 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 219.290929204 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 59.6318159433 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.7083333333 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.624657533 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7083333333 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 49.9408914729 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.67153284672 1.64882698954 101% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370409400077 0.391690518653 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109940657872 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0944144277304 0.077325440228 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.471262171157 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116039971678 0.149214159877 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128327802727 0.161403998019 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599635055285 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.292600135657 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0415805025219 0.0692045440612 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231594022421 0.275328986314 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700920433215 0.0653680567796 107% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.